My AI landscape looked worse after I fixed the hands

I spent 4 hours last Tuesday tweaking a mountain scene because a deer had 5 legs, and once I corrected it, the whole image lost its texture and felt flat. Learning that the small flaws were actually adding depth made me think we're too focused on perfection in these prompts. Anyone else find their best outputs come from leaving some mistakes in?

1 comments

1 Comment

rowan_wells6715d ago

Man, that hits home hard. My buddy spent a whole weekend on this sci-fi cityscape, and the floating cars were all janky and doubling shadows. He fixed every single one of them pixel by pixel, and then the whole skyline looked like a flat video game menu. He sent me the before and after, and honestly, the "broken" version had this weird life to it, like the chaos made it feel real. Now he just leaves in one tiny weird thing on purpose, like a crooked streetlight or a funky cloud, just to keep that texture alive. It's wild how our brains find the rough edges more interesting than the clean lines.